Research and Rehabilitation : The Conflict of Scientific and Treatment Roles in Corrections

means by which both groups fail to contribute to the development of a scientific penology as a result of different evaluations of a relatively similar frame of reference is explored. The common elements in their respective frames of reference, and the requirements of a scientific penology, suggests the need for closer working relationships between practitioner and researcher. A general model for evaluation in corrections is presented and the steps by which integrative efforts can be attempted are explored on the basis of the model.